Parismont.com - The Paris tourist attractions that aren’t worth a visit

Not only do I disagree with this listing, but I also question how much the author of it knows about Paris. The top of the arc is an excellent place to get an elevated view of the city, though the skyline has been marred by the construction of the '70's, '80's and so on. The writer suggests that there is "now" an underground passageway, but there has been one since the 1960's. Only an idiot would wade out into traffic at L'Etoile, although, once you get to the observation area of the 'arc' it's fun to watch the idiots down below trying to weave their way through traffic. Btoom line: this is touristy but fun and often more accessible than the Eiffel Tower.... and btw, whenever one visits a foreign country some knowledge of that language is useful....

Not only do I disagree with this listing, but I also question how much the author of it knows about Paris. The top of the arc is an excellent place to get an elevated view of the city, though the skyline has been marred by the construction of the ’70’s, ’80’s and so on. The writer suggests that there is “now” an underground passageway, but there has been one since the 1960’s. Only an idiot would wade out into traffic at L’Etoile, although, once you get to the observation area of the ‘arc’ it’s fun to watch the idiots down below trying to weave their way through traffic. Btoom line: this is touristy but fun and often more accessible than the Eiffel Tower…. and btw, whenever one visits a foreign country some knowledge of that language is useful.

Next comment: "it stinks it stinks it stinks waste of [...]"
Previous comment: "I disagree with your assessment. The Ar [...]"

Comment to: Arch of Triumph (Arc de Triomphe)